This is an old revision of the document!
====== IAM 950 HW1 ====== **1.** Write numerical simulation for the heat eqn $u_t = \nu u_{xx}$ on a periodic domain $[-L/2,L/2]$ using Fourier spatial discretization and Crank-Nicolson temporal discretization. Verify that your code works correctly by simulating the Gaussian-decay solution <latex> u(x,t) = (4 \pi \nu t)^{-1/2} e^{-x^2/4\nu t} </latex> from t = 1 to 100 for parameters $\nu$ = 2, L=100, dt = 1/16, and 128 gridpoints. That is, initialize your numerical code with u(x,1) and then compare the results of the numerical time integration with u(x,t) evaluated from the above formula. I suggest plotting both quantities versus x at regular intervals in time. Make a plot of the numerical solution and the Gaussian solution versus x at t=100 to turn in. Are the two entirely consistent? If not, why not? **2.** Copy and revise your heat equation code so that it simulated the 1d Swift-Hohenberg equation, $u_t = (r-1) u - 2 u_{xx} - u_{xxxx} - u^3$ on a periodic domain $[0,L]$ using Fourier spatial discretization and Crank-Nicolson/Adams-Bashforth semi-implicit temporal discretization. **3.** Copy and revise your Swift-Hohenberg code so that it simulates the 1d Kuramoto-Sivashinsky equation, $u_t = - u_{xx} - u_{xxxx}- u u_x$.
