User Tools

Site Tools


docs:utils:randomfield

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
docs:utils:randomfield [2009/04/01 08:27]
gibson
docs:utils:randomfield [2010/02/02 07:55] (current)
Line 25: Line 25:
   <​fieldname> ​ (trailing arg 1)                        output file   <​fieldname> ​ (trailing arg 1)                        output file
 </​code>​ </​code>​
- 
 ===== mathematics ===== ===== mathematics =====
  
Line 31: Line 30:
  
 <​latex>​ <​latex>​
-{\bf u}(x,​y,​z) ​ = sum_{jklm} u_{jklm} T_l(y) ​exp(2 pi i (jx/Lx + kz/Lz){\bf e}_m+{\bf u}(x,​y,​z) ​ = \sum_{jklm} u_{jklm} T_l(y) ​e^{\pi \, i (jx/Lx + kz/Lz){\bf e}_m
 </​latex>​ </​latex>​
  
Line 37: Line 36:
  
 <​latex>​ <​latex>​
-u_{jklm} = (\text{random # in }[-1, 1]) * \text{smoothness}^{|l| + |j| + |k|}+u_{jklm} = (\text{random # in }[-1, 1]) * \text{(1-smoothness)}^{|l| + |j| + |k|}
 </​latex>​ </​latex>​
  
 with corrections to meet boundary and divergence conditions and rescaling so that L2Norm(u) = magnitude. with corrections to meet boundary and divergence conditions and rescaling so that L2Norm(u) = magnitude.
 +
 +The form of spectral decay chosen is crude, but normally what is needed in a random field is that 
 +it meets the BCs and zero-div, is controllably smooth, and excites modes with all symmetries. It would probably be better to work the length scales Lx,Ly,Lz into the exponent of ''​(1-smoothness)'',​ so that the variations in the random field are roughly spatially isotropic. ​
  
  
  
  
docs/utils/randomfield.1238599641.txt.gz ยท Last modified: 2009/04/01 08:27 by gibson