This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
gtspring:spieker_blog:try_2proc [2009/04/07 15:41] dspieker |
gtspring:spieker_blog:try_2proc [2010/02/02 07:55] (current) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
for i in eq2_*.ff ; do tag=${i#eq2_} ; couette -T0 0 -T1 400 -o data-${tag%.ff} $i ; done | for i in eq2_*.ff ; do tag=${i#eq2_} ; couette -T0 0 -T1 400 -o data-${tag%.ff} $i ; done | ||
- | I then created a parameter dependent flow field, that mixed the two least contracting directions, or equivalently, john's e_theta. | + | I then created a parameter dependent flow field, that mixed two fields, or equivalently, john's e_theta. |
<latex> | <latex> | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
</latex> | </latex> | ||
- | I set theta to be pi/4, to get the strongest possible contribution from both fields. | + | I set theta to be pi/4, to get the strongest possible contribution from both fields. I then used poincare.cpp to calculate the intersections of each of the trajectories calculated in the script and saved them to disk. I then plotted them, and what resulted is what is in my blog. |