User Tools

Site Tools


gtspring:spieker_blog:try_2proc

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
gtspring:spieker_blog:try_2proc [2009/04/07 15:21]
dspieker
gtspring:spieker_blog:try_2proc [2010/02/02 07:55] (current)
Line 28: Line 28:
   for i in eq2_*.ff ; do tag=${i#​eq2_} ; couette -T0 0 -T1 400 -o data-${tag%.ff} $i ; done   for i in eq2_*.ff ; do tag=${i#​eq2_} ; couette -T0 0 -T1 400 -o data-${tag%.ff} $i ; done
  
-I then created a parameter dependent flow field, that mixed the two least contracting directions, or equivalently,​ john's e_theta.+I then created a parameter dependent flow field, that mixed two fields, or equivalently,​ john's e_theta.
  
-\\latex\\ e_theta ​= sin(\theta)u_0 + cos(\theta)u_1 \\latex\\+<latex
 +e_{\theta} ​= sin(\theta)\vec{u}_0 ​+ cos(\theta)\vec{u}_1 
 +</latex>
  
-I set theta to be pi/4, to get the strongest possible contribution from both fields.+I set theta to be pi/4, to get the strongest possible contribution from both fields.  I then used poincare.cpp to calculate the intersections of each of the trajectories calculated in the script and saved them to disk.  I then plotted them, and what resulted is what is in my blog.
gtspring/spieker_blog/try_2proc.1239142909.txt.gz · Last modified: 2009/04/07 15:21 by dspieker