This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| gtspring:spieker_blog:try_2proc [2009/04/07 15:16] dspieker created | gtspring:spieker_blog:try_2proc [2010/02/02 07:55] (current) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| for i in eq2_*.ff ; do tag=${i#eq2_} ; couette -T0 0 -T1 400 -o data-${tag%.ff} $i ; done | for i in eq2_*.ff ; do tag=${i#eq2_} ; couette -T0 0 -T1 400 -o data-${tag%.ff} $i ; done | ||
| + | I then created a parameter dependent flow field, that mixed two fields, or equivalently, john's e_theta. | ||
| + | <latex> | ||
| + | e_{\theta} = sin(\theta)\vec{u}_0 + cos(\theta)\vec{u}_1 | ||
| + | </latex> | ||
| + | |||
| + | I set theta to be pi/4, to get the strongest possible contribution from both fields.  I then used poincare.cpp to calculate the intersections of each of the trajectories calculated in the script and saved them to disk. I then plotted them, and what resulted is what is in my blog. | ||